LDS Church hires lobbying firm to help gain status in Italy
Law.com is reporting that the LDS Church has taken the unprecedented step of hiring a federally registered lobbyist to help its efforts in obtaining a new legal status in Italy. The LDS Church has formed a coalition with several other denominations in an effort to lobby the Italian parliament for an intesa, or “understanding.” Like many countries, Italy has different status levels for religious denominations. According to John Zackrison, former in-house counsel for the Mormon Church and now outside counsel working at Kirton & McConkie, the intesa the Church seeks would provide benefits such as a streamlined process to license Mormon ecclesiastical leaders to perform civil marriages and easier missionary visa renewals. There are also significant tax benefits, such as easier property tax exemptions and some charitable contribution deductions for individual Mormons. The intesa sought by the LDS Church would actually entitle the Church to public funds, but Zackrison says the proposed draft agreement promises that the Mormon Church would never accept such funds.
These sorts of agreements take years to achieve, particularly in countries such as Italy where the government is not known for its efficiency. Additionally, the strong presence of the Roman Catholic Church impedes acceptance of new religions, causing tradition-oriented political parties to oppose such official recognition. It wasn’t until 1966 that the Mormon Church was officially recognized by the Italian government. But now that the Church has plans for a temple in Rome, the favorable conditions of an intesa are even more important.
This is not the first time representatives of the LDS Church have lobbied government officials for various causes or issues. The Church even maintains a Public Affairs in Washington, D.C., and has public relations and legal representatives in many countries. However, this marks the first time that the Church has hired an outside firm to help it’s U.S. embassy lobbying efforts. Law.com reports Zackrison as saying: “The advice we’ve received is, if the U.S. government were to weigh in favor of the [agreements] in some way, that — with the current Italian government — could be helpful in the process . . . .” State Department spokesperson Darby Holliday says that the U.S. government hasn’t spoken with the Italian government on the issue, but the apparent goal of the new lobbying arrangement is to change that.
Photo credit: Elizabeth Buie.
Note: this post was updated to clarify that this is the first time a lobbyist has registered with the federal government on behalf of the LDS Church. The Church has long used both in-house and outside lobbyists domestically.

Quote: “However, this marks the first time that the Church has hired an outside firm to help it’s lobbying efforts.”
This statement is an outlandish exaggeration. What has the LDS Church hired lobbyiest for in the past?
Reference: Tresiddor, Alan, Paid lobbyist representing the LDS Church to oppose HB-2827, testimony given at a public hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting held on May 28, 2009 at 8AM, Oregon State Legislature, 2009 Session
HB-2827 extends the statute of limitations to age 40 for victims of child abuse to sue those organizations responsible for enabling or causing their abuse.
The LDS Church and Archdioceses strongly opposed this bill.
It however, passed and rights of abused children were extended. That was a good bill!
If you are Mormon, are you proud of your 5 cents of tithing being spent on blocking child abuse rights laws? What if your child fell in this category? Mormons routinely collect tithing from children. This effort was totally wrong and immoral in my opinion! How about you?
I recognize the possible confusion, and have clarified the sentence and noted the change at the bottom of the post. I relied on the reporting from Law.com, which appears to have been mistaken. It still remains a unique scenario in which religious organizations are lobbying a U.S. Embassy.
The rest of your comments seem to address another topic entirely, one discussed at length here.